Critical Discourse Analysis Essay -- Social Discourse

Critical Discourse AnalysisJan blommaert and Chris Bulcaen makes a brief introduction to the report card of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). CDA intends to use neighborly-theoretical method in confabulation analysis and is primarily lingualally based (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.447). It intends to analyze the structural relationships of dominance, discrimination, berth and control through a textual study (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.448). Based on the assumption that social talk about is constructed and socially conditioned, CDA explores the author dynamics in this process.According to Fairclough, CDA analysis can be divided into three-dimensions first, discours-as-text which analyzes the textual linguistic elements as concrete instances of plow second, confabulation-as-discursive-practice, especially focusing on discourse processes like speech act, coherence and intertexuality third, discourse-as-social-practice which examines the effects and the hegemonic process in the discourse (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.448-9). While both the second and the third dimension consider the establishment of text elements or quotes as intertexuality, the second dimension makes the interaction between text and context visible and the third dimension makes the discursive power dynamic visible as well. Moreover, they point out that CDA aims to undertake a social responsibility to correct particular discourses for replace, empowerment, and practice-orientedness (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.449). Because of this, CDA pay large charge to social topics and works on two main directions power and ideology, and change of the structuralist determinism (Blommaet & Bulcaen, 2000, p.452). Although it ambitiously put such great emphasis on social phenomena o... ...te in the 1960s which reflected two opposite public opinions on telecasting and radio respectively. More current example could be the different screw of a same news text people read on a mainstream newspaper and o n a facebook sharing page. As Blommaert and Bulcaen educe the incorporation of linguistic and nonlinguistic dimensions, this could be taken into consideration in further studies. ReferenceBlommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical discourse analysis. AnnualReview of Anthropology,29, 447-66.Schroder, K.C. (2007). Media discourse analysis researching cultural meaning from inception to reception. Texual Cultures Texts, Contexts, Interpretation 2, 2, 77-99.Steensland, B. (2008). Why do policy frames change? actor-ideacoevolution in debates on welfare reform. Social Forces, 86(3), 1027-54.